SB Valley Coordinated
Traffic Signal System Plan
In September 1999, the SANBAG Board of Directors authorized the development of a strategic plan for interconnecting and coordinating traffic signals in the San Bernardino valley area across jurisdictional boundaries. Study participants included the cities of Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardino, Upland and Yucaipa; San Bernardino County; Caltrans District 8; and SANBAG.
Over a broad area, a system of coordinated traffic signals results in a 12 to 15 percent reduction in travel times and an associated reduction in fuel consumption, mobile source emissions, and rear-end collisions. Long term, the study recommends establishing Traffic Monitoring Centers with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol to operate and monitor the system throughout the valley.
The study objectives included preparing an inventory of existing signals, identifying potential corridors for signal synchronization, evaluating alternative interconnect and signal systems, and recommending an improvement program to coordinate traffic signals on a regional basis. To evaluate and prioritize the most effective system, 14 weighted factors were applied to 75 major streets to identify the highest priority corridors. Of the more than 1,200 existing and proposed near-term signals in the valley, nearly 1,000 were recommended for coordination; approximately 800 of these are on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) network of major streets.
A strategic plan was developed to synchronize these significant arterials. The cost of implementing this system is approximately $15 million. This cost includes the necessary communication links, computer hardware and software, and development of coordinated signal timing plans.
Four phases or tiers were recommended for implementation of this program.
- For cities only: access the file sharing portal. Login and password are required.
- Tier 1 and Tier 2
- Tier 3 and Tier 4
- Traffic Signal Coordination FAQ
Tier 1 & Tier 2
The Tier 1 program began engineering, design and equipment procurement in 2002 using Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. Construction and timing implementation was completed in September 2008. Tier 1 improved and coordinated 299 signals on east-west arterials along the I-10 and SR-60 corridors and north-south arterial segments that will improve traffic flow between the east-west arterials and linkages to the freeway.
Tier 2 of the program improved and coordinated 294 signals along major arterial streets in the San Bernardino Valley.
A progress report for both Tier 1 and Tier 2 will be completed in early 2009 to evaluate the traffic flow improvement and emission reduction.
Tier 3 & Tier 4
The remaining two tiers (Tier 3 & 4) are estimated at $6.5 million. Tier 3 program will improve and coordinated 145 signals on north-south major street between Route 210, Interstate 10 and Route 60. Tier 4 of the program will improve and coordinate 325 signals along other major streets in the San Bernardino Valley. Funding for Tier 3 & 4 will be a combination of CMAQ funds and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TLSP) funds under the Proposition 1B Bond. A Request for Proposal for design and develop a signal-timing plan will be issued in November 2008 upon SANBAG Board approval. Tier 3 & 4 is expected to be completed by Dec ember 2011.
- Q: What is Traffic Signal Coordination?
A: Traffic signal synchronization is a method of timing groups of traffic signals along an arterial to provide smooth movement of traffic with minimal stops. The quality of the resulting progression is a function of the spacing of the signals, the prevailing speeds, the amount of traffic coming in and out of driveways between traffic signals, the uniformity of intersection sizes, and the cycle length. - Q: Why does it take so long for the signal to turn green?
A: To allow the coordination of the arterial, the side street must wait until the main traffic movement on the arterial has gone through the intersection. It is possible that the arterial traffic can't be seen immediately, but will soon be passing through the intersection.
The goal of signal coordination is to get the greatest number of vehicles through the system with the fewest stops in a comfortable manner. The reduction of large numbers of vehicles sitting idle at an intersection leads to a reduction in vehicle emissions. It would be ideal if every vehicle entering the system could proceed through the system without stopping. This is not possible even in a well-spaced, well-designed system. Therefore, in traffic synchronization, "the majority rules" and the busiest traffic movements are given priority. Depending on a route, the master cycle length of an arterial could vary from 60 to 120 seconds. This means that if you were exiting a side street, and you just missed the light, it is possible to wait between 60 and 120 seconds, or whatever is the cycle length, before receiving another green light. Generally, the busier and the larger the intersection, the longer the required cycle length. - Q: Why is this particular street not included in the traffic signal coordination plan?
A: Not all streets warrant coordination. Typically, a street is selected for coordination if it carries a certain amount of traffic along the arterial during peak hours. In most cases, coordination is active from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. during weekdays. The individual signals operate on a “first-come-first-served” or traffic activated basis outside of these hours, or all the time if a street is not selected to be synchronized. - Q: Will I be able to tell the difference when traveling on an arterial with traffic signal coordinated?
A: During peak hours motorists who drive at an appropriate speed should notice fewer red lights during their commute.
SANBAG Contact
Philip Chu
Transportation Planning Analyst
Phone: (909) 884-8276
Fax: (909) 885-4407
Email: pchu@sanbag.ca.gov

